feat: Add thoughts on html mails post
All checks were successful
ci/woodpecker/push/woodpecker Pipeline was successful

This commit is contained in:
2025-07-12 12:48:20 +02:00
parent 3fb5a5d4fc
commit 2388e78c5f
3 changed files with 125 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
---
title: "Thoughts on HTML mails"
date: 2025-07-12T12:05:10+02:00
draft: false
image: "uploads/html-e-mails.png"
categories: ['English']
tags: ['email', 'html', 'plaintext', 'django', 'notfellchen']
---
Lately I worked on notification e-mails for [notfellchen.org](https://notfellchen.org). Initially I just sent text
notifications without links to the site. Terrible idea! An E-Mail notification I send always has Call-to-Action or at
minimum a link to more information.
I left the system like this for half a year because it kinda worked for me (didn't suck enough for me to care), and I was the main receiver of these notifications.
However, as the platform is developed further and more users join I need to think about more user-centric notifications.
So what do I imagine is important to a user?
*
* **Information benefit**: An e-mail has the purpose to inform a user. This information should be immediately visible & understandable.
* **Actionables**: Users should be able to act on the information received. This is the bright red button "DO SOMETHING NOW!" you see so often.
* **Unsubscribing**: Informing e-mails stop is not only a legal requirement and morally the right thing to do but it also gives users agency and - I hope - increases the User Experience
With these I naturally came to the next question: Plaintext or HTML?
Some people would say [Plaintext is inherently better](https://useplaintext.email/) than HTML e-mails. Many of these reasons resonate with me including:
* Privacy invasion and tracking
* HTML emails are less accessible
* Some clients can't display HTML emails at all
* Mail client vulnerabilities
These are all valid points and are a reason I generally enjoy plaintext e-mails when I receive them.
But this is not about me but users. And there are some real benefits of HTML e-mails:
* Visually appealing: This is subjective but generally most users seem to agree on that
* User guidance: Rich text provides a real benefit when searching for the relevant information
Be honest: Do you read automated e-mails you receive completely? Or do you just skim for important information?
And here HTML-mails shine: **Information can easily be highlighted** and big button can lead the user to do the right action.
Some might argue that you can also a highlight a link in plaintext but that nearly always will worsen accessibility for screen-reader user.
# The result
In the end, I decided that providing plaintext-only e-mails was not enough. I set up html mails, mostly using
[djangos send_mail](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.2/topics/email/#send-mail) function where I can pass the html message and attattching it correctly is done for me.
![A screenshot of an e-mail in thunderbird. The e-mail is structured in header, body and footer. The header says "Notfellchen.org", the body shows a message that a new user was registered and a bright green button to show the user. The footer offers a link to unsubscribe](mail_screenshot.png)
For anyone that is interested, here is how most my notifications are sent
```python
def send_notification_email(notification_pk):
notification = Notification.objects.get(pk=notification_pk)
subject = f"{notification.title}"
context = {"notification": notification, }
if notification.notification_type == NotificationTypeChoices.NEW_REPORT_COMMENT or notification.notification_type == NotificationTypeChoices.NEW_REPORT_AN:
html_message = render_to_string('fellchensammlung/mail/notifications/report.html', context)
plain_message = render_to_string('fellchensammlung/mail/notifications/report.txt', context)
[...]
elif notification.notification_type == NotificationTypeChoices.NEW_COMMENT:
html_message = render_to_string('fellchensammlung/mail/notifications/new-comment.html', context)
plain_message = render_to_string('fellchensammlung/mail/notifications/new-comment.txt', context)
else:
raise NotImplementedError("Unknown notification type")
if "plain_message" not in locals():
plain_message = strip_tags(html_message)
mail.send_mail(subject, plain_message, settings.DEFAULT_FROM_EMAIL,
[notification.user_to_notify.email],
html_message=html_message)
```
Yes this could be made more efficient - for now it works. I made the notification framework too complicated initially, so I'm still tyring out what works and what doesn't.
Here is the html template
```html
{% extends "fellchensammlung/mail/base.html" %}
{% load i18n %}
{% block title %}
{% translate 'Neuer User' %}
{% endblock %}
{% block content %}
<p>Moin,</p>
<p>
es wurde ein neuer Useraccount erstellt.
</p>
<p>
Details findest du hier
</p>
<p>
<a href="{{ notification.user_related.get_full_url }}" class="cta-button">{% translate 'User anzeigen' %}</a>
</p>
{% endblock %}
```
and here the plaintext
```
{% extends "fellchensammlung/mail/base.txt" %}
{% load i18n %}
{% block content %}{% blocktranslate %}Moin,
es wurde ein neuer Useraccount erstellt.
User anzeigen: {{ new_user_url }}
{% endblocktranslate %}{% endblock %}
```
Works pretty well for now. People that prefer plaintext will get these and most users will have skimmable html e-mail where the
styling will help them recognize where it's from and what to do. Accessibility-wise this seems like the best option.
And while adding a new notification will force me to create
* a new notification type,
* two new e-mail templates and
* a proper rendering on the website
this seems okay. Notifications are useful, but I don't want to shove them everywhere. I'm not running facebook or linkedin after all.
So for now I'm pretty happy with the new shiny e-mails and will roll out the changes soon (if I don't find any more wired bugs).
PS: I wrote this post after reading [blog & website in the age of containerized socials](https://blog.avas.space/blog-website-eval/) by ava.
Maybe this "Thoughts on" format will stay and I will post these in addition to more structured deep dives.

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 51 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 197 KiB